Does fairness matter in corporate takeovers?

نویسنده

  • Henrik Kristensen
چکیده

In interviews with the two head negotiators for a buying and a selling company in a Swedish takeover, a fair price was found to play an important role. A stated reason was that the companies wanted to do business in the future. To further test the importance of fairness, 88 graduate students of business administration playing the role of buyers were asked to evaluate selling prices in ®ctitious corporate takeovers. The results showed that both satisfaction with the o€ered selling prices and willingness to buy were a€ected by information about a fair price. Furthermore, the possibility of doing business in the future appeared to have some importance for this e€ect. Ó 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PsycINFO classi®cation: 2340 JEL classi®cation: C70; C91; G3

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Role of Hostile Takeovers in Corporate Governance

The study makes a distinction between the role of hostile takeovers as a mechanism for downsizing and exit in the process of ‘creative destruction’ and the role of hostile takeovers as a corporate governance mechanism for curbing managerial slack and opportunism. The likelihood that underperforming firms with ineffective internal governance structures are the targets of hostile takeover bids is...

متن کامل

Corporate Governance forthcoming in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law

While some of the questions have been around since Berle and Means (1932), the term \corporate governance" did not exist in the English language until twenty years ago. In the last two decades, however, corporate governance issues have become important not only in the academic literature, but also in public policy debates. During this period, corporate governance has been identi ed with takeove...

متن کامل

vorking paper department of economics Breach of Trust in Takeovers and the Optimal Corporate Charter

This paper analyzes how takeovers and takeover defenses affect the value of target companies, using an incomplete contracts framework. We consider a raider who intends to improve the efficiency of production and to appropriate the rents enjoyed by stakeholders of the company. Anticipating this rent shifting the stakeholders invest too little in relationship specific assets which may offset the ...

متن کامل

Auzius Kazombo Mwale Department of Accounting & Finance Testing the inefficient management hypothesis: Are United Kingdom mergers and acquisitions disciplinary?

A large body of research has examined the impact of takeovers on corporate performance. Although there has been a considerable volume of research on the wealth effects of takeovers to date, there has been very little evidence on the disciplinary role. The aim of this study is to contribute to the takeover debate by examining whether UK takeovers are disciplinary. This study replicates previous ...

متن کامل

Discipline or Disruption? Stakeholder Relationships and the Effect of Takeover Threat

Although a sizable literature suggests that shareholders prefer greater vulnerability to takeovers because it reduces agency problems, the threat of takeovers can also impose ex ante costs on firms by adversely affecting important stakeholders, such as major customers. In this paper, we find that for firms with corporate customers as important stakeholders, a reduction in the threat of takeover...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999